Saturday, November 9, 2013

Obamacare: Making Lemonade

Responding to:
PERSPECTIVE
J. F. Wharam and Others
N Engl J Med 369:1481, October 17, 2013

The authors point out the real and predictable failings of a market-based health care system: it costs too much (duh).  And they suggest more market-based reforms to fix the problems of unaffordably high deductibles and co-pays in the Obamacare health insurance exchanges (premiums could be lower too).  California is perfectly poised to leverage the situation by taking the obvious next step towards a single payer system (a goal for 2017): authorize the elected Insurance Commissioner to set the prices of the health insurance plans. The legislation's been introduced and almost passed several times.  The Exchanges have already whittled down the insurance plans to only a few left standing, and set compulsory enrollment, and standardized benefits. Chopping their rates and profits gets pretty close to the role health insurance plans already now play in Medicare, as third party administrators.  

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Ellen Shaffer in the Media

Dr Ellen Shaffer reacts to the United States Government being shutdown
Cameron Green speaks to Co-Director of the Centre for Policy Analysis Dr Ellen Shaffer
ABC NewsRadio Afternoons - Last updated 16:07 Duration 7:12
ABC Australia 9-30-13
 
 

Impact of the Shutdown! Economic and Healthcare

The government shutdown will be the topic of conversation from the economic impacts to how long it may last.  Christian Dorsey, of the Economic Policy Institute, will talk about how the shutdown effects the lives of real people (as opposed to politicians and the next election) and the politics behind it.  Dr. Ellen Shaffer, UCSF, will talk about how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is being impacted, if at all, and how the ACA will impact the lives of millions of currently uninsured Americans. 

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Shaffer in AJPH on the Affordable Care Act: The Value of Systemic Disruption

AJPH: The ACA; Value of Systemic Disruption – Ellen R Shaffer

It is important to recognize the political and policy accomplishments of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), anticipate its limitations, and use the levers it provides strategically to address the problems it does not resolve.  Passage of the ACA broke the political logjam that long stymied national progress toward equitable, quality, universal, affordable health care. It extends coverage for the uninsured, who are disproportionately low income and people of color, curbs health insurance abuses, and initiates improvements in the quality of care.   However, challenges to affordability and cost control persist.
 
Public health advocates should mobilize for coverage for abortion care and for immigrants, encourage public-sector involvement in negotiating health care prices, and counter disinformation by opponents on the right.

Tables in the article summarize major changes in coverage, insurance company protections, and quality/affordability.

 (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print February 14, 2013: e1–e4. doi:10.2105/ AJPH.2012.301180

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Best tweet of the night

MR summary: Mexican drug lords use Obamacare 2 buy guns frm Libyan terrorists 2 sell 2 single moms who dont have time to make dinner

Arrogant, racist Romney could not believe that the President actually remembered accurately his own statement in the Rose Garden labeling the Libyan incident an act of terrorism.  And still didn't believe it til Candy Crowley confirmed it.  (He didn't ask if she was married.)

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Women, Choice and Power

Turns out, women are a key voting bloc in the upcoming election. It's up to us not only to get each other engaged, and voting. but to demand credible commitments that address our concerns.

Here are our choices heading into the political conventions:

A Republican Party fueled with unprecedented gushers of corporate cash that draws political life support from the medieval wing of several fundamentalist religions, whose fantastical beliefs about women's biology are rooted in their ironclad devotion to patriarchy.

A Democratic Party also overly dependent on the parasitic finance sector, that is now reaching back to the Lily Ledbetter Equal Pay Act of 2009 to symbolize its commitment to women's economic empowerment. It depends for political fuel in no small part on the indisputable fact that the Republicans are profoundly scary.

Polls show the 2 running neck in neck.

In fact, this election offers women a clear choice. The Republican platform would make criminals of the 30% of American women who've had an abortion (including me, once because of a fetal anomaly diagnosed in my second trimester). The Affordable Care Act, which Paul Ryan has voted repeatedly to repeal, assures more affordable birth control and extends Medicare's financial health, in contrast to Ryan's proposal to privatize it.

But it's not enough to debunk the opposition's lies, or to point out that they rely on stoking fear and anger. Some recent polls of women who are not politically active show that they do react viscerally to the demeaning insults slung by decision-makers they perceive as "mean, old, white men." But they are living difficult lives, bounded not only by state legislatures that snatch away their birth control and penalize them for their reproductive decisions, but by extensive financial hardship. One quote: "I'm happy this month that I haven't had to sell plasma to feed my children."

So here are some things to call for in Charlotte:

1. An iron clad commitment to preserving and protecting Social Security and Medicare. These two programs form the bedrock of women's financial security as we age. They are under attack explicitly by the Republicans. And too frequently for comfort, our side also periodically lip synchs the lies about the needs to reform these "entitlements." Let's hear Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid and future House Speaker Nancy Pelosi confirm that the programs are solvent, and that they will not compromise on preserving and improving these programs.

2. It's great that Nancy Keenan of NARAL and Cecile Richards of Planned Parenthood will be speaking. Women's rights to make their own decisions about their reproductive health are fundamental to our economic and personal wellbeing, including access to legal, affordable birth control and abortion. We hope their introductions will include words of support from HHS and the Surgeon General.

3. Finally: Lots of women. On the podium, speaking, in charge, active, visible, and vocal. Women of all races, and for that matter, candidates for races. We know who the top ticket nominees are. Let's give a boost to the EMILY's List all-star roster of pro-choice Democratic women candidates, people like Maggie Hassan for governor of New Hampshire, Congressional candidates like Grace Meng, Christie Vilsack, Val Demings, and Tammy Duckworth, and Elizabeth Warren and Tammy Baldwin for Senate, and of course, incumbent Sen. Claire McCaskill. Since Canadian-born former governor Jennifer Granholm can't run for president, nominate her now for a Cabinet post, if she wants one, and give her air time.

We're going to write checks, emails and op eds, as well as getting out the vote. We have power. Let's recognize and exercise it.



Saturday, August 11, 2012

Paul Ryan: Marching Backwards on Medicare

Let's get one thing perfectly straight:  Paul Ryan wants to end Medicare.

His 2012 proposal is less straightforward about it than his 2011 proposal.

It would, nevertheless, end Medicare. And the Affordable Care Act.

Single payer/Medicare for All?  Fuhggedaboudit.

Here's  quick back-of-the-envelope on how it shapes up:


 Features
Medicare Now
Old Ryan Plan
"New" Ryan Plan
Age you are eligible
65
67, increase starting 2023
67, complete by 2034
Privatization initiatives
Drug plan, Medicare Advantage
Vouchers for everyone
Vouchers phased in
Extra costs to seniors
Baseline
$6,000 a year
 ?
Medicare as % of Federal expenditures
6.5%
 ?
4.5%
Savings mechanisms
ACA: IPAB, primary care,  EMRs, ACOs
Vouchers: Individual seniors control costs through purchases
Vouchers: Individual seniors control costs through purchases
+
Insurance industry competition


Do we need to do more to improve and expand Medicare? Indeed. But Ryan would double down on disaster.

On Medicare for All, he had this exchange with reporter Sam Husseini, published June 13, 2011:

Sam Husseini: If you’re a fiscal conservative and you want to provide a safety net, why wouldn’t you be for something like a single-payer health care system?

Paul Ryan: I think a single-payer health care system would be a disaster for people who need health-care the most. I think it would cause rationing, waiting lines. I think it would be a fiscal house of cards, I think it would help accelerate a national debt crisis and hurt the economy.

Husseini: Wouldn’t it save a lot of money and cover everybody?

Ryan: Absolutely not. I totally and fundamentally disagree with it. I believe that you can have affordable access to healthcare for all Americans, including people with pre-existing conditions, without a government takeover of the healthcare sector. If we actually have government-run healthcare, what I think you’ll have is government managing, government-rationing healthcare. I think that will be a fiscal disaster, I think that it would accelerate a debt crisis that would slow our economy and take jobs and economic growth from those people that need it the most, which are people who are out of work.

Husseini: Doesn’t Medicare have a much lower — 2 or 3 percent — overhead compared to the insurance companies? Which — insurance companies –

Ryan: — That’s an apples and oranges comparison. If you take a look at Medicare itself, Medicare is going bankrupt.

Husseini: That’s the healthcare system in general that’s going bankrupt.

Ryan: There are three facts about medicare that you simply can’t dispute: 10,000 seniors are retiring everyday with fewer workers going into the workforce to pay for them; healthcare costs are skyrocketing at about four times the rate of inflation, which threatens medicare’s ability to give affordable care; and number three, the non-partisan experts agree that Medicare is going bankrupt. So Medicare’s status quo is bankruptcy and that threatens healthcare not only for current seniors but obviously for future seniors, so I believe a patient-centered healthcare system — reforms that put the patient at the center of the healthcare system, not the government — are the best for people who need healthcare and they’re best for the economy, and they’re the best way to avert a debt crisis.

Husseini: But isn’t the problem with healthcare fundamentally the corporate structure? I mean your biggest funders are a who’s who — Northwestern Mutual –

Ryan: — Which is a big employer in Milwaukee by the way —

Husseini: — Aurora Health Care, Abbott Laboratories, Credit Suisse — the insurers — [see "Paul Ryan's Health Industry Ties..." Humana Inc., Blue Cross/Blue Shield and Aetna]
Ryan: — Government-run healthcare doesn’t work. Wherever we’ve seen government-run healthcare, it’s failed.
Husseini: You think that people are worse off in France and Canada?

Ryan: I think we’re worse off if we go with a government healthcare system that will cost us jobs, it will increase our deficit and our debt and I do believe, and I put ideas on the table that show, that we can get to a patient-centered healthcare system that helps create jobs, that helps get healthcare costs under control, and gives everybody affordable healthcare coverage for everyone regardless of income or pre-existing conditions.

Husseini: You think poor people in Europe are worse off than poor people here?

Ryan ends questioning here.

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Mr. President: Campaign on Health Care Reform!

Dear Mr. President:  
You won on health care.  Campaign on it.

You won historic legislation in 2010. Your advisors told you to change the subject and campaign on the economy.  You lost the mid-term elections, big time.
 
You won a victory in the Supreme Court this week. The same advisors who counseled you then are at it again. I don't know what economic accomplishments they think you should run on.  I know a few things about what you've done in health care.

The Affordable Care Act instituted system reforms in how we pay doctors, and how they practice medicine, that are reducing the actual cost of health care. This is tremendous news.  It is not showing up yet in reduced insurance premiums.  But your law makes it possible to do so.
 
Health care spending growth has slowed from double digits to 4% or lower. Further, hospital admissions are down, even among insured people. Writing in Health Affairs in April Kenneth Kaufman states that "independent of the recession, other fundamental and structural changes are likely contributing to the flattening of the cost curve, and further, these changes have the potential to significantly alter the curve’s path into the future."
 
Kaufman quotes Jeff Goldsmith, Ph.D., President of Health Futures, Inc., who "suggests that the makeup and organization of the nation’s physicians is one source of the slowing cost growth. Physicians of the past 30 years typically practiced in solo or small group practices. Under the fee-for-service system, they were incentivized to work long hours, see as many patients as they possibly could, and buy into labs, ambulatory clinics, and specialty hospitals. As a result, they tended to be high users of inpatient and outpatient services. These more entrepreneurial physicians are now reaching retirement age and many tens of thousands are opting to exit the workforce. Replacing them are physicians of a new generation, which has different work and lifestyle expectations. For many younger physicians, owning a practice is not as important as having time to spend with the family and a steady, predictable income.

"One effect is that physicians have sought employment by hospitals...and in larger group practices, many of which now employ hundreds of doctors. They are practicing medicine in ways that remove utilization and cost from the system. Protocols to reduce variation in care delivery, chronic disease management, case management, and other approaches are increasingly being adopted by physicians nationwide. Larger practices owned by hospitals and other entities will have the capital and human resources required to successfully reduce care costs through such approaches, slowing health-spending growth going forward."
 
Other efforts include "moving from an activity-based business model that incentivizes utilization of services to a value-based model that incentivizes population health management across the continuum of care,"
 
Why aren't we seeing lower insurance premiums, then? 
 
First, the insurance industry isn't yet sufficiently regulated.  The Exchanges starting in 2014 will make regulation more likely.  States can use the ACA now to regulate on their own.  A progressive new Congress could create a competing public option, and allow states to create entirely public financing systems like Medicare.  Secondly, the system reforms are not yet universal.  In fact, some physicians are turning to "boutique" practices where they can take only wealthy patients who will continue to pay whatever high fees the docs require to maintain their incomes.

The political good news is that the opposition program will clearly hurl us right back into the days of double-digit health care cost inflation, while cutting seniors and others out of access to care. Surely impressive information for the American people.

The Ryan/Romney proposals would turn Medicare and Medicaid into voucher systems.  Every person would get a coupon worth a certain dollar amount, and go out and look for the best deal from doctors, hospitals, and drug companies.  This means bringing the kind negotiations from the car dealership to the hospital every time we and our families get sick.  For most rational Americans, not an appealing prospect.  It is certainly the end of Medicare.
 
The opposition hounded Dr. Don Berwick out of his position as administrator of the Medicare program, precisely because of his expertise in the kind of system reforms that are now working.
 
Mr. President, you need to stand with the many patients already benefiting from the improved coverage and consumer protections provided by the ACA, and fight for a second term that will propel us forward towards universal, affordable health care.